Critical Care Research and Practice
 Journal metrics
See full report
Acceptance rate20%
Submission to final decision126 days
Acceptance to publication14 days
CiteScore2.600
Journal Citation Indicator0.310
Impact Factor1.7

Jehovah’s Witness Needing Critical Care: A Narrative Review on the Expanding Arsenal

Read the full article

 Journal profile

Critical Care Research and Practice publishes articles related to anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine, and the integration of intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management.

 Editor spotlight

Chief Editor, Dr Thomas J. Esposito, works in the Division of Trauma Surgical Critical Care and Burns at Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, USA.

 Special Issues

Do you think there is an emerging area of research that really needs to be highlighted? Or an existing research area that has been overlooked or would benefit from deeper investigation? Raise the profile of a research area by leading a Special Issue.

Latest Articles

More articles
Research Article

A Prospective Study Evaluating Gender Differences of Serious Outcomes through Difficult Airway Physiological Score (DAPS) in the Emergency Department

Introduction. Gender variation in critically ill adults after resuscitation is reported in many studies. However, this variation is not well established when evaluating the physiological instability in this population. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the gender variation in serious outcomes by the difficult airway physiological score (DAPS) among critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation (ETI). Methods. This is a cohort study conducted from August 2021 to December 2022 in the emergency department of Aga Khan University. The prospective validity of the difficult airway physiological score was derived using retrospective data and includes 12 variables: sex, age, time of intubation, hypotension, respiratory distress, vomiting, shock index >0.9, pH < 7.3, fever, anticipated decline, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 15, and agitation. The serious outcomes were cardiac arrest, mortality (within 1 hour after intubation in emergency), hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg), and oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 92%). The difference between males and females was assessed using the chi-square test, and the association of gender and serious outcomes was explored using Cox and logistic regression analysis. ROC curve analysis and area under the curve assessed score validity separately in males and females with serious outcomes. Results. We enrolled 326 patients with a mean age of 50.3 (±17.8), with 123 (33.7%) females and 203 (62.2%) males. 198 (60.7%) patients were >45 years old, of which 136 (67%) were male and 62 (50.4%) female. Cardiac arrest was observed in 56 (17.2%), with 24 (19.5%) females and 32 (15.8%) males, value 0.348. Hypotension after intubation was observed in 132 (40.5%) patients, 56 (45.5%) females and 76 (37.4%) males, value 0.149. Oxygen saturation (<92%) was observed in 80 (24.5%) patients, 32 (26%) females and 48 (23.6%) males, value 0.630. In females, the DAPS of 11 had an area under the curve of 0.863 (0.74–0.91). The sensitivity of the score was 84.8%, the specificity was 71.9%, the PPV was 77.8%, and the NPV was 80.4% with an accuracy of 78.9%. In males, the DAPS score of 14 had an area under the curve of 0.892 (0.57–0.75). The sensitivity of the score was 67%, the specificity 93.8%, the PPV 92.2%, and the NPV 72.2% with an accuracy of 79.8%. Conclusions. The Difficult Airway Physiological Score (DAPS) predicts the risk of serious outcomes after intubation with high precision and reliability with different score cutoffs between the two sexes, highlighting the gender variation of a difficult airway.

Research Article

Clinical Significance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in Predicting Delirium among Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Delirium is a serious and complex problem facing critically ill patients. This retrospective study aimed to explore the association between prognostic nutrition index (PNI) and delirium in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study was based on the Medical Information Mart Intensive Care IV (MIMIC IV) database. Patients over 18 years of age were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between PNI and delirium. Tendency analysis, subgroups analysis, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) were selected to further certify the association. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was adopted to assess the predictability of PNI to delirium. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the interference of confounders. A total of 3,105 patients participated in this study. As the grade of malnutrition increases, the incidence of delirium increases in all models. The odds ratios (OR) of delirium in the fully adjusted model were 1.00 (reference), 1.04 (0.80, 1.36), 1.53 (1.17, 1.99), and 1.93 (1.44, 2.59). Strong U-shaped curves were found with RCS analysis between delirium and PNI in the subgroups of patients over 60 years of age and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). After PSM, the ORs of delirium were 1.44 (1.16, 1.79) and 1.53 (1.22, 1.93), respectively, in the univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. PNI is negatively associated with the prevalence of delirium in critically ill adults in the ICU. PNI is an independent risk factor for the incidence of delirium in adults in the ICU.

Research Article

Continuous Infusion of Ketamine in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with SARS-CoV-2

Background. Widespread drug shortages led to higher utilization of ketamine in our intensive care unit, especially among patients with SARS-CoV-2. Objectives. To evaluate the impact of continuous infusion of ketamine on vasopressor requirements in patients with SARS-CoV-2. Method. This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study comparing mechanically ventilated (MV), adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 receiving either propofol or ketamine for at least 72 hours. Results. 84 patients (mean age of 61-year-old, 68% male) were analyzed. 31 patients received ketamine, and 53 patients received propofol. Mean vasopressor doses were not significantly different between ketamine and propofol groups at prespecified timepoints. However, mean arterial pressures (MAP) were higher in the ketamine group at 24 h, 48 h, and 96 h postsedative initiation. The median opioid infusion requirements were 3 vs. 12.5 mg/hr () for ketamine and propofol groups, respectively. Comparing to propofol, C-reactive protein (CRP) values were significantly lower in the ketamine group at 24 h (7.53 vs. 15.9 mg/dL, ), 48 h (5.23 vs. 14.1 mg/dL, ), and 72 h (6.4 vs. 12.1 mg/dL, ). Conclusion. In patients with SARS-CoV-2 on MV, there was no difference in the vasopressor requirement in patients receiving ketamine compared to propofol. Nevertheless, the use of ketamine was associated with higher MAP, reductions in CRP in select timepoints, and overall lower opioid requirements.

Research Article

Practice and Predictors of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in a Tertiary-Care Intensive Care Unit in Saudi Arabia

Introduction. The objective of this study was to describe Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) practices in a tertiary-care intensive care unit (ICU) in Saudi Arabia, and determine the predictors and outcomes of patients who had DNR orders. Methods. This retrospective cohort study was based on a prospectively collected database for a medical-surgicalIntensive CareDepartment in a tertiary-care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (1999–2017). We compared patients who had DNR orders during the ICU stay with those with “full code.” The primary outcome was hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included ICU mortality, tracheostomy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the ICU and hospital. Results. Among 24790 patients admitted to the ICU over the 19-year study period, 3217 (13%) had DNR orders during the ICU stay. Compared to patients with “full code,” patients with DNR orders were older (median 67 years [Q1, Q3: 55, 76] versus 57 years [Q1, Q3: 33, 71], ), were more likely to be females (43% versus 38%, ), had worse premorbid functional status (WHO performance status scores 4-5: 606[18.9%] versus 1894[8.8%], ), higher prevalence of comorbid conditions, and higher APACHE II score (median 28 [Q1, Q3: 23, 34] versus 19 [Q1, Q3: 13, 25], ) and were more likely to be mechanically ventilated (83% versus 55%, ). Patients had DNR orders were more likely to die in the ICU (67.8% versus 8.5%, ) and hospital (82.4% versus 18.1%, ). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the following were associated with an increased likelihood of DNR status: increasing age (odds ratio (OR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.02), higher APACHE II score (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.08–1.10), and worse WHO performance status score. Patients admitted in recent years (2012–2017 versus 2002–2005) were less likely to have DNR orders (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.32–0.39, ). Patients with DNR orders had higher ICU mortality, more tracheostomies, longer duration of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay compared to patients with with “full code” but they had shorter length of hospital stay. Conclusion. In a tertiary-care hospital in Saudi Arabia, 13% of critically ill patients had DNR orders during ICU stay. This study identified several predictors of DNR orders, including the severity of illness and poor premorbid functional status.

Research Article

Sequelae of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Large Single-Center Experience

Background. Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are a vulnerable immunocompromised population at risk of severe COVID-19 disease and mortality after SARS-CoV-2 infection. We sought to characterize the post-infection sequelae in KTRs at our center. Methods. We studied all adult KTRs (with a functioning allograft) who had their first episode of SARS-CoV-2 infection between 04/2020 and 04/2022. Outcomes of interest included risk factors for hospitalization, all-cause mortality, COVID-19-related mortality, and allograft failure. Results. Of 979 KTRs with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 381 (39%) were hospitalized. In the multivariate analysis, risk factors for hospitalization included advanced age/year (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02–1.04), male sex (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04–1.60), non-white race (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.17–1.88), and diabetes as a cause of ESKD (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.41–2.21). SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59–0.90), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.37–0.74), and COVID-19-related mortality (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31–0.71) in the univariate and multivariate analyses. Risk factors for both all-cause and COVID-19-related mortality in the multivariate analyses included advanced age, hospitalization, and respiratory symptoms for hospital admission. Furthermore, additional risk factors for all-cause mortality in the multivariate analysis included being a non-white recipient and diabetes as a cause of ESKD, with being a recipient of a living donor as protective. Conclusions. Hospitalization due to COVID-19-associated symptoms is associated with increased mortality. Vaccination is a protective factor against hospitalization and mortality.

Review Article

Questioning the Role of Carotid Artery Ultrasound in Assessing Fluid Responsiveness in Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. A noninvasive and accurate method of identifying fluid responsiveness in hemodynamically unstable patients has long been sought by physicians. Carotid ultrasound (US) is one such modality previously canvassed for this purpose. The aim of this novel systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate whether critically unwell patients who are requiring intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation (fluid responders) can be identified accurately with carotid US. Methods. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO on the 30/11/2022 (ID number: CRD42022380284). Studies investigating carotid ultrasound accuracy in assessing fluid responsiveness in hemodynamically unstable patients were included. Studies were identified through searches of six databases, all run on 4 November 2022, Medline, Embase, Emcare, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines. Results were pooled, meta-analysis was conducted where amenable, and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models were established to compare carotid ultrasound measures. Results. Seventeen studies were included (n = 842), with 1048 fluid challenges. 441 (42.1%) were fluid responsive. Four different carotid US measures were investigated, including change in carotid doppler peak velocity (∆CDPV), carotid blood flow (CBF), change in carotid artery velocity time integral (∆CAVTI), and carotid flow time (CFT). Pooled carotid US had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 0.73 (0.66–0.78), 0.82 (0.72–0.90), and 0.81 (0.78–0.85), respectively. ∆CDPV had sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC with 95% CI of 0.72 (0.64–0.80), 0.87 (0.73–0.94), and 0.82 (0.78–0.85), respectively. CBF had sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC with 95% CI of 0.70 (0.56–0.80), 0.80 (0.50–0.94), and 0.77 (0.78–0.85), respectively. Risk of bias and assessment was undertaken using the QUADAS-2 and GRADE tools. The QUADAS-2 found that studies generally had an unclear or high risk of bias but with low applicability concerns. The GRADE assessment showed that ∆CDPV and CBF had low accuracy for sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion. It appears that carotid US has a limited ability to predict fluid responsiveness in critically unwell patients. ∆CDPV demonstrates the greatest accuracy of all measures analyzed. Further high-quality studies using consistent study design would help confirm this.

Critical Care Research and Practice
 Journal metrics
See full report
Acceptance rate20%
Submission to final decision126 days
Acceptance to publication14 days
CiteScore2.600
Journal Citation Indicator0.310
Impact Factor1.7
 Submit Evaluate your manuscript with the free Manuscript Language Checker

We have begun to integrate the 200+ Hindawi journals into Wiley’s journal portfolio. You can find out more about how this benefits our journal communities on our FAQ.